Just want to point out, regarding the Rush comparisons; nothing Peart played was remarkably technically advanced. The reason Rush is a challenge to play is mostly not because of technique, it's because of all the detail, and the precision of it.
Compared to other rock and pop, there's nearly an album's worth of drumming in some of those songs. If you're going to play them as recorded, it's a lot to get right in one take.
Buddy's playing, on the other hand; you either have the education and skills to physically play it or you don't.
As far as Buddy theoretically putting his own spin on Rush tunes, it would just ruin the music regardless of his unquestionable ability.
Improvisation makes jazz great. But Rush's music is like a grid. Like most classical music, every note needs to be in it's place or it's just wrong.
This is assuming Buddy would be playing the material without much rehearsal time. If he had a month or two of daily rehearsals, including listening to recordings of the rehearsals and getting feedback from band members, I guarantee you he could nail it. But I agree, without that prep time, it wouldn’t sound like Rush. It would sound like a great jazz drummer doing his best to sound like Rush, but not having enough prep time
No doubt Buddy Rich would nail it. That's kind of my point, that Rush (and similar music) is more about learning the song than being profoundly technically capable. The challenge is not leaving anything out, and not having to substitute Neil's precise, deliberate notes with your own . . . stuff.
Contrarily, the challenge to playing Buddy's music is, frankly, even being able to make your hands do what his could do.
Yeah. I mean, it’s certainly possible to learn buddy’s solos note-for-note, but his genius was just making it up in the moment out of little bits and pieces he had worked on. And playing with enough intensity to hold your interest
I feel the same way. I have the Rich vs Roach record and I find Max's solos far more interesting and musical.I feel like Buddy would have overplayed a Rush song...sort of like Neil underplaying Buddy stuff.
I am not a fan of Buddy to be honest. As a young drummer, he did not impress me past the initial "he's fast" stuff, so I am sort of biased against him.
but the memes don't effect me at all, same with his comments
and I also think @Frank Godiva brings up a good point: what Buddy songs are memorable? I have the Krupa vs Rich drum battle album, and a few of those songs stick with me, more b/c I played the crap out of that album as a kid. But when I think of great jazz songs, nothing related to Rich comes up
What make/model is his snare there? 4 x 14? And do his sticks look thin to you? less than 7A?Bud also was a Gentle Perfectionist
all you have to do is listen to the last note here:
You had me until the final sentence. I mean, your previous two paragraphs were all about how all previous generations were intolerant and overly sensitive. Unless by "we currently live in an era" you were being ironical and actually meant "all humans always live in an era."Age old saga of those that come before us. Buddys era was jazz so all after is noise. His parents would have been classical so to them jazz is noise. Im 55 so my era is classic rock and grunge so indu and alternative is noise. My daughters era is alternative so in a few years what ever is the "modern" genre will be noise. And so on.
Id like to think i am different. I try to find the beauty in all music and while it may not be immediately evident to me i will always listen to whats next and find some enjoyment.
We currently live in an era where tolerance is WAY down and sensitivity is WAY up.
AMEN equiptmendork...AMEN.Buddy, were he around today, would be in a category I reserve for, say, Morrissey or Kanye; you just expect to hear ridiculous things from them, so to me it's neither shocking nor terribly interesting when they fire off their latest salvo.
Buddy didn't like rock. Big whoop. He didn't like a lot of things. Doesn't change the way I feel about his playing. Buddy was who he was.
Dan
To be convincing, rock begins with an attitude and attitudes are generational . What is hip ? It's reflected in the circumstances of the world you live in .You hit the nail on the head. What did Buddy actually create? He mostly played big band standards, right? Guys like Gavin Harrison and Peart have created music. Their creative contributions were as instrumental to the compositions as their band mates’. One song’s parts are as unique as the next. Buddy had amazing rudimentary technique, but once you’ve seen one solo, you’ve seen them all. That egotistical jerk has the nerve to knock rock drummers?
You can't really take the quotes seriously, even the ones he actually *did* say, lol.
Absolutelybut I have often been struck by just how many top artists continue to be interested in new music and new artists and new styles, even in their 60s and 70s and 80s,
The guy could probably play any Rush song with a four piece.When Peart tried to play Buddy Rich in a Burning For Buddy series of tributes it sounded flat and clunky. From memory Omar Hakim, I think it was, killed it. I never found the series on my own. Someone showed it to me.
Buddy could've played Rush with little issue. He'd have enjoyed some passages, but the song structures weren't what he dug most.
Could he play Damien Schmitt or Tony Royster Jr in the matrix passages? Because that's what they look like when each is in full on mode. Like they're in the matrix.