Jeremy Bender
Platinum Member
I dunno but I bet being Kenny G's drummer is a sweet paying gig.
Very cool summary.. love it!Like most drumming, the answer resides within the history of the music itself
Watch the Adam Neely video I posted. He specifically references your point.
A definition of jazz made by jazz musicians and scholars, according to his video, uses three elements: Swing, Blues, and Improvisation. Of course, there's tons of music that we'd never call jazz that swings, has blues inflections, and improvisation. (and of course, there's jazz that doesn't have those three elements, which Neely also talks about)
If we're really going to loosely define jazz as some widely encompassing thing, then everything is jazz and genre doesn't matter, so this whole discussion is pointless.
Put yourself in London 1968.
"Swing, Blues, and Improvisation"
That's exactly what early Sabbath was.
Check out Bill Ward in the early 70s........recognize that bass drum art?
Thats Bill Wards tip of the hat to Gene Krupa and big band Jazz................
Alright, you guys convinced me. Black Sabbath, John Coltrane, Led Zeppelin, Miles Davis, and the Jazz Messengers are all the same genre.
whether it's "Barracuda" or "Ornithology"
it's two hands two feet butt on seat.
sorry to hear about your girlfriend .Jazz is sum made up stuff dat real mewsitions would never play. Dey can't read moosic, dey take drugs, den make passes at chur girlfriend--or even da wife!
And that's why, to quote Jeff Healy "My record collection pretty much bops it on the head about WWII" (at least as far as Jazz is concerned)....venues got smaller with no dance floor and the music became less groovy to keep people from dancing. So jazz became a “muscle chops” fest because you had to wow the audience with phenomenal playing-most likely creating the jazz drumming you’re describing.
There's some truth to that, but some people just have just have different ideas about music or different taste. We don't have a burning desire to play music we wouldn't want to listen to, no matter how technically impressive it is. If I could make a wish, I'd much rather be able to play like a good orchestral drummer than a Jazz wizard.Then maybe JAZZ its what all the drummers would like to be able to play but they dont have the honesty to admit...
I compare it to reading Martin Heidegger. Heidegger is a difficult slog and at the end - it's a big nothing-burger. There's not much there. But philosophy geeks go "Ooh! Ooh and ah!" over Heidegger, assuming that because his writing is so inaccessible it must be brilliant. Jazz can be like that sometimes.Depending of the type of jazz it's often an intellectual experience, not easily accessible to everyone.
And, of course, there's two ways to take that.Usually when I listen to jazz solos, I find that there are no right notes.
There's the rub. I watched a guy lecturing about symphonic music and he said "good music" should be challenging enough that a listener has to be engaged, but accessible enough that a listener can make some sense of it. Music that fits that definition is different for everyone, and keeps changing. Maybe I don't like Jazz because it's just over my head. It's possible.I still love modern jazz, and all kinds of different spins on it. I think sometimes its just so outside that I wonder.. if I’m struggling to make sense out of it.. how are non-musicians ever going to get this.
As a Jazz ignoramus, that's the distinguishing mark I recognize first. But I've had people tell me that some pre-war Jazz tunes aren't Jazz. To them, it's all about virtuosic improvisation and they can't see how a radio friendly melody could be considered Jazz.at the root, I still feel like jazz is rooted in the feel of the spang-a-lang rhythm. The broken triplet feel that that is.
And that's why, to quote Jeff Healy "My record collection pretty much bops it on the head about WWII" (at least as far as Jazz is concerned).
There's some truth to that, but some people just have just have different ideas about music or different taste. We don't have a burning desire to play music we wouldn't want to listen to, no matter how technically impressive it is. If I could make a wish, I'd much rather be able to play like a good orchestral drummer than a Jazz wizard.
I compare it to reading Martin Heidegger. Heidegger is a difficult slog and at the end - it's a big nothing-burger. There's not much there. But philosophy geeks go....
Kinda a cool drum part. I don't think I have heard that in more than 40 years. I will confess I don't hear/feel swing in that either. I am, however, still in the McGuffey 1st Eclectic Reader when it comes to picking swing influences out in rock pieces.I guess I'm ignorant as to what swing is. Which part is swing? Early in the song he was using the toms kind of melodic.
Maybe I don't like Jazz because it's just over my head.
Alright, you guys convinced me. Black Sabbath, John Coltrane, Led Zeppelin, Miles Davis, and the Jazz Messengers are all the same genre.
So... Jazz is in the ear of the behearer?
Almost all of bebop? Most stuff after WWII that isn't very groove oriented and could be described as "noodely-oodely-oodely" by someone who's not a Jazz fan. I often listen to the Jazz radio station in Toronto when I'm driving, and visit The Rex, so I've been hearing a lot more Jazz in recent years but, for the most part, I only enjoy the stuff that seems more coherent to me. That could mean I just like stuff that's easier to understand because I'm not up to speed yet.That covers a lot of territory. Which record?
Almost all of bebop? Most stuff after WWII that isn't very groove oriented and could be described as "noodely-oodely-oodely" by someone who's not a Jazz fan. I often listen to the Jazz radio station in Toronto when I'm driving, and visit The Rex, so I've been hearing a lot more Jazz in recent years but, for the most part, I only enjoy the stuff that seems more coherent to me. That could mean I just like stuff that's easier to understand because I'm not up to speed yet.