who pissed in your cereal this morning jeezIf you say so...
?
not only drumsI have a question for those that have stated their origin of manufacture preference: do you apply that to every thing you buy, or does it only matter when it's drums?
Also, those against China manufacturing: do you patently avoid anything from China, or again, is it just drums?
there are also tons of threads that make asian manufactured kits look very bad. countless entry level drums with destroyed bearing edges, no customer service, no company history, cheap metal, list goes on.Superior American quality is btw e.g. discussed here. The Squeak King Pedal. https://www.drummerworld.com/forums...-what-my-brand-new-speed-king-squeaks.174219/
There are tons of threads like these where American drummakers don't look good at all.
And when comparing the Starclassics to the Neusonics, leaving propaganda aside, it's a no-brainer that the Starclassics are much better quality.
Maybe your bad manners.who pissed in your cereal this morning jeez
“If the Starclassics are considered midrange, then the Pearl Masters are what? Entry level drums???Maybe your bad manners.
Re the sound, the Neusonics sound WAY better than they should, being at the bottom (price-wise) of the US-made Ludwig lines. It is common to equate quality and sound with price, but Ludwig has bucked that trend with the Keystones and now the Neusonics. They did the same back in 1968 with the Standard series. I've used Classic Maple and Keystones on tour and in the studio, and look forward to moving 'down' to my Neusonics when the gigs resume and on the next tour.
has anyone had durability issues with the neusonics?The entire reason behind the "sounds great in GC" is that the Neusonic is a low mass kit, and will sound better in an acoustic setting than a commodity kit. We're comparing an acoustic instrument to an instrument taylored for amplification. IE: My Yamaha acoustic guitar sounds better than my Les Paul... Until I plug in my Les Paul.... Amplification is the great equalizer.
The Tama undoubtedly has more durable hardware, and arguably superior fit-n-finish.
Those are regular Starclassic Maple finishes.Where'd you find these pics? These finishes are not currently on the Tama website.
has anyone had durability issues with the neusonics?
Since when is asking for an answer and/or valid criticism to your post bad manners? Oh my...“If the Starclassics are considered midrange, then the Pearl Masters are what? Entry level drums???
*Facepalm*”
you mean these bad manners?
well if nobody has actually reported any durability issues then how do we really know if the starclassic W/B has better durability than the neusonics... there could be predictions sure, and my concern initially was the bass drum legs. but now that ludwig changed them to the CM style legs, i have no concerns about that kit.Not that I know of. This is more an attestation of Tama's legendary durability than a suggestion that Ludwig has a shortcoming.
pretty condescending if you ask me. if i answered to a statement my boss made at work like that i would get called out. but i take that people around you are more tolerant of such behaviour?Since when is asking for an answer and/or valid criticism to your post bad manners? Oh my...
*Double facepalm*
i don’t see why it’s flawed and i don’t see you trying to make your own point. all i see is you being condescending. it doesn’t have to be personal man, people have different opinions. agree to disagree or make your point. you’re not doing any of those things.Yaddayada. You are not my boss and should stop like a kid when someone strictly disagrees with your opinion, especially if it is obviously flawed.
i’ve had the opposite experience. ludwig may have bad reputation for their older stuff but their new stuff is great.On a side note had Ludwig drums and they were not on par with Tama or Yamaha.
brushes said:
Fritz Frigursson said: