Don't get me wrong, Straight Edge. Metronome is not a wrong method of teaching technique. I just think we're talking a slight variation in approach. Part of me wonders if teachers prefer metronomes in the lesson (and practice) space because of its simple utility in judging success or failure. If you slip just a little, it's obvious. Then you need to make an immediate correction (this is what I disdain about it) to stay within the click, or you start over at the nearest '1' count.
The other thing, as I've mentioned in other threads, is that real live music ebbs and flows with time, with different sections within a piece. So if a student only practices to a metronome, then he or she might be adversely affected when it comes to playing with other musicians in a live setting. We've already established in other discussions, that groove is more than keeping time. It's more to do with dynamics, and playing what's complimentary to those you're playing with.
I was trying to "eloquently" incorporate the ideas of your post about technique because I totally agree with you in yours as well, but only had a short amount of time to write that last post
and when I read yours, and thought about my approach, it is a combination of your physical technique things and my use of the met to understand space control
but yeah, I do not deny that there is human ebb and flow to music that we all have to be aware of. In my past experience, the people who practice with a met are the ones who adjust to, and fit into, that ebb and flow quicker, and more naturally. And I think that is because of learning the idea of space control, and having a foundation to then adjust to.
also, in my personal situation (and you know this b/c you did marching band) - being a competitive marching percussion coordinator - it is a much different arena...where we are trying to get 60-90 people (20-30 drummers) to all play with each other, while running around on a field. The met is soooo much a part of building that foundation - which does have human ebb and flow without the met - and knowledge of timing, and how to react to it's change is more crucial there than in a stage band, or concert band where physical movement and assessment over distance is not an element. Also, in those situations, there are usually not 2 or more drummers trying to coordinate playing the same thing at the same time. To me, the met is foundation #1.
I guess, in short, I am not in the camp who believes that the metronome is detrimental to, or a waste of, practice usage and time.
i think the met is an "honesty" tool...and a lot of people don't like the honest answer that they sometimes get with the met...that of not being able to play in time...I hear that ALL the time. Usually from non drummers. "Oh man, the met just messes me up" or the best: " the click is slowing down"...
?