I've got to help out with a cloud migration for one of our customers tomorrow. Going to take all day and then in the evening I'm doing a security course. I think I need to channel some @Supergrobi to get me through.
PING 185.178.193.83 (185.178.193.83): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 185.178.193.83: icmp_seq=0 ttl=32 time=218.657 ms
64 bytes from 185.178.193.83: icmp_seq=1 ttl=32 time=387.562 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 2
Request timeout for icmp_seq 3
64 bytes from 185.178.193.83: icmp_seq=4 ttl=32 time=254.553 ms
64 bytes from 185.178.193.83: icmp_seq=5 ttl=32 time=276.620 ms
64 bytes from 185.178.193.83: icmp_seq=6 ttl=32 time=301.392 ms
64 bytes from 185.178.193.83: icmp_seq=7 ttl=32 time=319.435 ms
64 bytes from 185.178.193.83: icmp_seq=8 ttl=32 time=243.442 ms
64 bytes from 185.178.193.83: icmp_seq=9 ttl=32 time=264.533 ms
64 bytes from 185.178.193.83: icmp_seq=10 ttl=32 time=287.900 ms
64 bytes from 185.178.193.83: icmp_seq=11 ttl=32 time=313.013 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 12
64 bytes from 185.178.193.83: icmp_seq=13 ttl=32 time=256.245 ms
64 bytes from 185.178.193.83: icmp_seq=14 ttl=32 time=246.688 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 15
64 bytes from 185.178.193.83: icmp_seq=16 ttl=32 time=215.213 ms
64 bytes from 185.178.193.83: icmp_seq=17 ttl=32 time=240.643 ms
64 bytes from 185.178.193.83: icmp_seq=18 ttl=32 time=259.275 ms
^C
--- 185.178.193.83 ping statistics ---
19 packets transmitted, 15 packets received, 21.1% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 215.213/272.345/387.562/42.975 ms
From Australia using a VPN in Melbourne Australia.
C:\Windows\system32>ping 185.178.193.83
Pinging 185.178.193.83 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 185.178.193.83: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=44
Reply from 185.178.193.83: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=44
Reply from 185.178.193.83: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=44
Reply from 185.178.193.83: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=44
Ping statistics for 185.178.193.83:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 270ms, Maximum = 270ms, Average = 270ms
Love the trash canThanks Supergrobi you are our hero-suck on it Superman, Batman, Aquaman, Ironman, Hulk, etc.
View attachment 126680
All looks fine there @SomeBadDrummer . Not only is your connection to Drummerworld looking good, you've got a nice fibre connection there!
Ping stats are off the charts! Do you own one of these?Here's a bunch of words and numbers and interesting use of special charachters & abbrvtns :
Pinging 185.178.193.83 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 185.178.193.83: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=46
Reply from 185.178.193.83: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=46
Reply from 185.178.193.83: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=46
Reply from 185.178.193.83: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=46
Ping statistics for 185.178.193.83:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 120ms, Maximum = 121ms, Average = 120ms
Here's a speed test:
View attachment 127498
And a different speed test about 20 minutes later:
015102050100+
30.0
Megabits per second
Testing upload...
82.4
Mbps download
30.0
Mbps upload
Latency: 4 ms
Server: Atlanta
Your Internet connection is very fast.
Your Internet connection should be able to handle multiple devices streaming HD videos, video conferencing, and gaming at the same time.
LEARN MORE
TEST AGAIN
Feedback
Not sure if this means what I think it means, unless it's something different than expected...what do you make of it?
Hey there @alstrange I own a small collection of vintage Zildjian A's of various zizes, and a pair of Sabian hats to compliment the 13" A's....but that is one incredibly gorgeous cymbal which I assume sounds amazing. The Rhythmatist.Ping stats are off the charts! Do you own one of these?
View attachment 127539
Thanks a lot dude!