When Dennis Chambers is listed as the drummer for Santana, as opposed to Parliament, Brecker Brothers, Scofield, Stern, Niacin... Then you know you're dealing with folks with a limited view.
This is all my opinion: I am not minimalizing anyone here.
The thing about the greats that baffle everyone, meaning how did they come up with those iconic drum parts and so on...I contend, as great as all the greats are/were...that their parts were not that hard for them to come up with because they intuitively felt them that way. Lets take Bonzo for example. When you have a wonderfully written song to jump off from...John Paul Jones thundering away on the bass and Jimmy Page's guitar wizardry...that's some very fertile ground to hear drum parts within. The desire to want to pull one's own weight within that realm of talent must have contributed too....
The execution I can certainly give them all kinds of credit for, no doubt, but I think the ideas came very easily and naturally, considering their context. They just felt it that way, and there's nothing mysterious about it. I don't think Bonham sat up at night crafting the fills, agonizing over every note, I think he just heard a fill, and OK then the execution needed to be practiced I'm sure, but the actual ideas?
I contend that it came very easily and intuitively. He just felt it in a really great way, which is a goal I am certainly working towards.
Again, this was all opinion. Maybe Bonzo did craft things very meticulously. I doubt it though, my impression is that he was a rough and ready type guy who just went for it with gusto.
Fishbones ... but heaps of top drummers groove like crazy ....
Larry, I'd guess that Bonzo (and others) are being intuitive too. Thing is, some drummers seem to have better instincts than others in the same way as some people's conversation flows better than others. The interesting question is how can we hone our instincts ... or maybe, how do we peel away the stuff that gets in the way of our instincts? What are the things that mess with our insincts? Ego? Being formulaic? Fear?
Most of those players have been given the freedom to do their schtik....that makes a big difference.
I can remember seeing the Who videos on MTV inparticular a song called "Eminence Front" where the drummer (Kenny ?) does absolutely nuthin creative thinkin to myself if Moonie had played this he woulda killed it....
Did that drummer have some killer licks he wanted to do but Pete and Roger told him to tone it down...who knows...if he was given the green light maybe he'd be on that list.
Kenney Jones picked up the sticks for the Who following Moonie's death, and you're right, he was stylistically a 180-degree turn from Moonie. He was very much a meat-and-potatoes straight-ahead session type guy. But then again, Simon Phillips and Zak Starkey don't play the parts the way Moonie did, either.
Picking Jones might have been a conscious decision right after Keith's death, to distance themselves from that sound, whether because they mutually decided that it was time to take their sound in a tighter direction (unspoken: "Now that HE'S gone...") or unconsciously didn't want someone to try and sound like their absent friend. Later, when introducing Simon Phillips at the Tommy shows in New York, Pete Townshend said, "We didn't even want to try to replace [Keith]." And as mentioned in the other thread about "why nobody plays like Keith anymore"... NOBODY plays like Keith anymore, whether by design, or the vagaries of the listening public and the music industry at large.
Anyway, I can't imagine what Keith could have done with "Eminence Front." Yeah, Kenny's part is basically a human drum loop, but so is the guitar part and the synth part for that matter. I've always more wondered why THAT was the single for the album.
Someone once said to me that Gadd played on countless recordings without a single "ill-played note." I don't believe the person who said this was referring to Steve's timing in comparison to a computer or a metronome. He was talking about Steve's overall musicality in the same way that a classical music expert might discuss the musicality of a great violinist. It's the phrasing, the sound, and...in the case of a drummer...the actual drum part itself.
I feel that this statement about Gadd could also apply to Bonham. To me, his drumming had it all. He had exquisite time that grooved in a deep, soulful way. He had creative drum parts, such as "When The Levee Breaks," which are burned into our memories for all-time. He had phenomenal control over the instrument to weave in and out of the various parts he had come up with. He even made our jaws drop from time to time with legendary drum moments like the "Good Times, Bad Times" bass drum lick, or the buzz saw fill in "Achille's Last Stand." And he did all of it while "breathing" with the natural ebb and flow of some of the greatest rock music in history.
To me, this is a staggering achievement...creatively, technically, and every other way. When I hear people discuss this as if it's not a technical achievement, it makes me wonder what exactly we are referring to when we talk about "technique." For me, technique means the ability to execute our ideas. I don't think I am alone in this. When a piano teacher tells a student that their technique needs work, what are they referring to? Their execution, right? Bonham's execution was about as beautiful as can be...which is why his drumming always stood out to so many people, even when he played a basic rhythm like the one in "Kashmir."
What might be the demographics of Rolling Stone?
The average age of these 20 drummers is 56.75 if they were all still living.
The oldest being 71 and the youngest 43. Ringo is 70
Are there no newer 'drum gods' for the current generation?
Or what about "You Better You Bet"? That was a huge single, but to me it's always sounded a little.... safe. With Keith, it would have gone dangerous in between the verses (and towards the end)... I like to think so anyways.
I just think of all the great bands I'm going to see in the Hereafter, and I smile...
There are loads of them. I have a feeling young people usually don't bother mentioning them because there is rarely ever any need, or point. Newer "great" drummers will simply be compared to past drummers from history,
There are more and more good drummers (bands!) nowadays.
Yet you use it in your signature! Are you trying to annoy yourself?p.s. notice my "question marks" around the term "great". I find terms like great etc, to be a little annoying. Subjectivity sucks.
Well, there can't be loads of them because then they would not be 'drum gods'. 'Drum God' is generally reserved for those that are iconic. And if you revere and idolize them you talk about them often and evangelize them.
When I was alot younger we had guitar gods, bass gods, piano/keyboard gods, ect. We sought for any recordings that they had done and talked about them alot! And these players were always compared to past or older players.
No argument from me and I follow many but... are they iconic? Are they considered 'Drum Gods' in the same vein as we (and I don't mean just drummers) bestow on Bonham, Peart, Buddy, ect.?
Yet you use it in your signature! Are you trying to annoy yourself?