ottog1979
Senior Member
The last few months I've really been focusing on keeping a steady meter. It became apparent that I didn't always do this and drifted BPM more than I'd like to admit or was aware of prior to now. So, I've been using a programmed metronome to get band songs started and Live BPM during the song as a way to focus on steady meter. It's definitely helped - I'm getting much better at it.
But, this has brought up a question and I'm interested in hearing the general consensus. There have been a few times recently when I don't get the Live BPM going during a practice song with the band and I felt like I was missing my crutch and anxious about it. So then the question: Can your steady meter improve to the point when you no longer feel the need for something like Live BPM? Or, is it common to continue to use these tools (like a click-track also), consistently on-going into the future simply because they are easily available and useful?
But, this has brought up a question and I'm interested in hearing the general consensus. There have been a few times recently when I don't get the Live BPM going during a practice song with the band and I felt like I was missing my crutch and anxious about it. So then the question: Can your steady meter improve to the point when you no longer feel the need for something like Live BPM? Or, is it common to continue to use these tools (like a click-track also), consistently on-going into the future simply because they are easily available and useful?