philrudd
Senior Member
What happened to separation of church and state?
That's a notion that's being taught in American public schools alongside math and science. And we know how American kids are doing in math and science.
What happened to separation of church and state?
That probably will never happen so it's a moot point.
If it did happen, the guy would be proven wrong and outvoted. Not really relevant.
What happened to separation of church and state? Wouldn't that apply here?
What happened to separation of church and state? Wouldn't that apply here?
That's just his opinion. Ha ha.
Ask someone why they like a painting or a piece of music? Why? Its because it pleases there [sic] eyes or ears, its [sic] not rocket science.
Using that argument would mean going through every post on this thread and asking them all to explain why they dislike......whatever.
But I have also seen the deffinition [sic] of tolerence [sic] or to tolerate as to imply superiority.
Even if that person is a member of Congress and they help pass or defeat laws based on these faulty "opinions"?
You tell me that chocolate is better than strawberry and I'll say "Whatever works for you", but you tell me that the Earth is flat, oil is being continuously produced inside the planet, the universe started 6000 years ago or something else that's demonstrably false and I'm not going to sit there and say "Yeah, sure, whatever floats your boat". I may never convince that person but there may well be bystanders who don't know the reality (and I've been in that exact position before).
Way to selectively read. Clearly you missed the part of my post which said you can't really argue over purely subjective things, like whether vanilla is better than chocolate.
Of course you did. Otherwise you wouldn't have written this.
If such a definition exists - I went through the first page of links resulting from Googling "tolerance definition" and failed to find it - it's probably the result of an intolerant person feeling justifiably crappy because they were called on it.
THIS.
THIS is the point MikeL totally missed or ignored. Nobody gives (or should give) a rat's fart if you think vanilla is better than chocolate or Ks are better than HHs.
The point is some opinions are stupid, indefensible, and can affect somebody or everybody else. Opinions like that women's bodies have the ability to not get pregnant if they get raped, or that the Earth is only 6,000 years old, or that climate change isn't happening. These opinions are countered by FACTS, not other opinions. In the case of chocolate vs. vanilla, neither position is factual; it's preference. If you believe the Earth is 6,000 years old, a 9-year-old with a connection to Google can demonstrate how wrong that is. It's "I like vanilla" as a counterargument to "The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (4.54 × 109 years ± 1%). This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samples."
THAT is why you are not entitled to your opinion.
And for the record, Tama is better than Yamaha.
ANTIDISESTABLISHMENTARIANISM!
Way to selectively read. Clearly you missed the part of my post which said you can't really argue over purely subjective things, like whether vanilla is better than chocolate.
Of course you did. Otherwise you wouldn't have written this.
If such a definition exists - I went through the first page of links resulting from Googling "tolerance definition" and failed to find it - it's probably the result of an intolerant person feeling justifiably crappy because they were called on it.
THIS.
THIS is the point MikeL totally missed or ignored. Nobody gives (or should give) a rat's fart if you think vanilla is better than chocolate or Ks are better than HHs.
The point is some opinions are stupid, indefensible, and can affect somebody or everybody else. Opinions like that women's bodies have the ability to not get pregnant if they get raped, or that the Earth is only 6,000 years old, or that climate change isn't happening. These opinions are countered by FACTS, not other opinions. In the case of chocolate vs. vanilla, neither position is factual; it's preference. If you believe the Earth is 6,000 years old, a 9-year-old with a connection to Google can demonstrate how wrong that is. It's "I like vanilla" as a counterargument to "The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (4.54 × 109 years ± 1%). This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samples."
THAT is why you are not entitled to your opinion.
And for the record, Tama is better than Yamaha.
ANTIDISESTABLISHMENTARIANISM!
Errr...No. You obviously missed my point, I was agreeing with you. Music is subjective. That is why I kept stating that I don't need to justify my musical likes and dislikes. The original thread I believe.
Conservative politicians worked out that religious folk were a sufficiently homogeneous group that could be targeted.
Shortly thereafter, religious leaders with political aspirations worked out that suddenly they were in a position to yank politicians' chains.
This is my understanding of what happened in the US - if anybody else has a better explanation I'm all ears.
Note to mods: I'm trying to understand/comment on history. Despite including both, this is neither a religious nor a political comment.
Well, I have to do a total backpedal and concede that one person's wacky opinion can indeed be harmful.
It was Jim spouting utter madness about glitter wraps that changed your mind, wasn't it?
I love glitter finishes, so long as they're on someone else's drums. I think they can look cool, but wraps & heavy lacquers really do adversely affect highly resonant shells. On less resonant shells, they make little to no difference, so that's fine for most drums out there.To me, putting glitter on nice wood drum shells is about as sensible as painting barber pole stripes on your horse. I'm sure Madge might have an opinion on that one. Andy, too.
The best of the classic rock drummers were half finished jazz drummers.