Stroman
Diamond Member
You had to know I was going to keep tinkering and posting about my new gadget, right? lol
Today, I used the Tune-Bot to experiment with my little collection of snare drums. I worked with:
1960's Slingerland Gene Krupa COB 5X14 (8 lug)
1970's Slingerland Artist 3-ply w/re-rings 5.5X14 (8 lug)
Rogers Powertone 5-ply w/re-rings 6.5X14 (8 lug)
Pearl Aluminum Sensitone 5X14 (10 lug)
Pork Pie Black over Brass BoB 6.5X14 (10 lug)
This is a relatively small sample, but I was able to make some general observations.
1) First of all, I'm still impressed with the Tune-Bot's ease of use, overall.
2) Snare drums provided more false readings than toms and bass for me. The mis-reads are very easy to spot, so I don't regard it as a huge problem. For example, I was in the 266Hz neighborhood, and ended up getting a couple readings in the 40s and a couple in the 300s. In each case, just taking the reading again sorted it out. When the reading is correct, it's consistent. I'd be more concerned if it bounced around 20 Hz or so, because then I'd worry about the accuracy. Instead, it just seems that the unit sometimes gets a stronger reading from some overtone. In any case, when I used the filter function I got no errant readings.
3) The metal drums were more likely to throw weird frequencies.
4) The wood drums were super easy to dial in.
5) The eight lug drums were, by far, easier to tune up than the 10-luggers. At some tunings, with the 10-lug drums, the lugs 90 degrees from the snare beds were barely past finger tight when the frequencies were correct. That's a phenomenon I've noticed before with 10-lug snares, and the Tune-Bot just reinforced my previous experience.
6) I expected difficulty from the snare side heads, based on other comments in the past, but they weren't that hard. I'd say tuning them is a little more finicky - I think because they are stretched so tight, they react differently to the tuning key. For example, if I was aiming for a reading of 398Hz and was sitting at 394, some lugs took 3 quarter turns and others might take one quarter turn to affect the same change. I found this was far more pronounced on the snare sides than on the batter heads, which were pretty predictable.
All in all, I love this thing! I know a lot of people aren't interested in the numbers and the data, and many people, myself included, can get a drum to sound good without it. But I love the ability to be able to experiment and actually measure and record your findings. Lots of fun! Plus, all my snare drums currently sound killah!
Today, I used the Tune-Bot to experiment with my little collection of snare drums. I worked with:
1960's Slingerland Gene Krupa COB 5X14 (8 lug)
1970's Slingerland Artist 3-ply w/re-rings 5.5X14 (8 lug)
Rogers Powertone 5-ply w/re-rings 6.5X14 (8 lug)
Pearl Aluminum Sensitone 5X14 (10 lug)
Pork Pie Black over Brass BoB 6.5X14 (10 lug)
This is a relatively small sample, but I was able to make some general observations.
1) First of all, I'm still impressed with the Tune-Bot's ease of use, overall.
2) Snare drums provided more false readings than toms and bass for me. The mis-reads are very easy to spot, so I don't regard it as a huge problem. For example, I was in the 266Hz neighborhood, and ended up getting a couple readings in the 40s and a couple in the 300s. In each case, just taking the reading again sorted it out. When the reading is correct, it's consistent. I'd be more concerned if it bounced around 20 Hz or so, because then I'd worry about the accuracy. Instead, it just seems that the unit sometimes gets a stronger reading from some overtone. In any case, when I used the filter function I got no errant readings.
3) The metal drums were more likely to throw weird frequencies.
4) The wood drums were super easy to dial in.
5) The eight lug drums were, by far, easier to tune up than the 10-luggers. At some tunings, with the 10-lug drums, the lugs 90 degrees from the snare beds were barely past finger tight when the frequencies were correct. That's a phenomenon I've noticed before with 10-lug snares, and the Tune-Bot just reinforced my previous experience.
6) I expected difficulty from the snare side heads, based on other comments in the past, but they weren't that hard. I'd say tuning them is a little more finicky - I think because they are stretched so tight, they react differently to the tuning key. For example, if I was aiming for a reading of 398Hz and was sitting at 394, some lugs took 3 quarter turns and others might take one quarter turn to affect the same change. I found this was far more pronounced on the snare sides than on the batter heads, which were pretty predictable.
All in all, I love this thing! I know a lot of people aren't interested in the numbers and the data, and many people, myself included, can get a drum to sound good without it. But I love the ability to be able to experiment and actually measure and record your findings. Lots of fun! Plus, all my snare drums currently sound killah!