2 hit wonder
Junior Member
I totally support discussion without slurs.
And yes, they are, but not always like you're intending to infer. I remember quoting a study that you posted and the stated possible ill effects and being called a slur for quoting the study.
So that hasn't been my experience in discussions. And we even discovered the false statements made that an item was tested when it wasn't and was stated as not having been.
The fact is, people use slurs against people who don't use slurs.
We can probably agree that the label "conspiracy theorist" is the modern day equivalent to the word "witch"? It's seldom used with any tangibles to back it up. It's a cop out.
And yes, they are, but not always like you're intending to infer. I remember quoting a study that you posted and the stated possible ill effects and being called a slur for quoting the study.
So that hasn't been my experience in discussions. And we even discovered the false statements made that an item was tested when it wasn't and was stated as not having been.
The fact is, people use slurs against people who don't use slurs.
We can probably agree that the label "conspiracy theorist" is the modern day equivalent to the word "witch"? It's seldom used with any tangibles to back it up. It's a cop out.
Last edited: