@toddy asked in Bermuda Here thread: You have been a long term member of the forum for many years by this stage. I was wondering, do you think that over these decades that the world has become better or worse for a drummer interested in making money? obviously there is covid so live work took a big hit. but what about things like remote recording etc, do you have any opinion on that?
edit* by money i mean a liveable monthly earning, e.g. £2000 / £24k a year.
There are several facets to this question. Rather than open too many cans of worms, I'll say that the number of opportunities has been pretty constant. In spite of the proliferation of programmed drums on recordings over the last 40 years, the number of artists and live performance opportunities seems to have increased. Not just because there are new artists, but because so many "legacy" artists are still out there pounding the pavement.
On a local level, I think club work has decreased a bit, and most think it doesn't pay enough to get by. But that depends on the amount of work (and of course the pay,) and one's expenses. And with housing being one of the largest necessary expenses, it depends where you live. In Los Angeles or New York City for example, making $500/wk playing bars would not be a living wage (unless you have another source of income, or a few roommates, or a spouse who helps with expenses.) Yet in a large city such as Phoenix, that same $500/wk easily covers an apartment and related expenses. Getting by is never about what you make, it's about what you spend.
Regarding remote recording, those opportunities aren't any better than being a studio drummer. There's not much call for them anymore due in part to programming, and to the fact that bands' drummers have become quite good at making good recordings and don't require a hired gun to step in. I know several musicians who do remote recording. Not one of them makes a living at it - it's always their side hustle.
There are still wedding bands and the like, and they usually pay well. But that's not every player's cup of tea.
But my basic answer to the question is, although things have changed, I think the opportunities are the same for a drummer.
edit* by money i mean a liveable monthly earning, e.g. £2000 / £24k a year.
There are several facets to this question. Rather than open too many cans of worms, I'll say that the number of opportunities has been pretty constant. In spite of the proliferation of programmed drums on recordings over the last 40 years, the number of artists and live performance opportunities seems to have increased. Not just because there are new artists, but because so many "legacy" artists are still out there pounding the pavement.
On a local level, I think club work has decreased a bit, and most think it doesn't pay enough to get by. But that depends on the amount of work (and of course the pay,) and one's expenses. And with housing being one of the largest necessary expenses, it depends where you live. In Los Angeles or New York City for example, making $500/wk playing bars would not be a living wage (unless you have another source of income, or a few roommates, or a spouse who helps with expenses.) Yet in a large city such as Phoenix, that same $500/wk easily covers an apartment and related expenses. Getting by is never about what you make, it's about what you spend.
Regarding remote recording, those opportunities aren't any better than being a studio drummer. There's not much call for them anymore due in part to programming, and to the fact that bands' drummers have become quite good at making good recordings and don't require a hired gun to step in. I know several musicians who do remote recording. Not one of them makes a living at it - it's always their side hustle.
There are still wedding bands and the like, and they usually pay well. But that's not every player's cup of tea.
But my basic answer to the question is, although things have changed, I think the opportunities are the same for a drummer.