Lars Ulrich

To see how Lars fits in, you have to look at the historical perspective.

As I've written before, How people view Lars tends to fall into one of two categories

1) Those were teenagers (or older) in the 80s who discovered Lars in the 80s, and remember Lars playing things that no one else was doing at the time (at least not in a way most people could see/hear). his raw speed on the first 4 Metallica albums was a relatively new concept at the time. While drummers had been using double bass for years, most used it for quads, shuffles, or just double bass roles. Lars came along and played all sorts of broken triplet patterns, syncopations, and quick rolls that no one else was playing on albums at the time. Playing thrash in 7/4 and 5/4 and all the crazy time signature changes on "And Justice For All" was ground breaking.
The first time "One" was played on MTV was a monumental occasion, as many of us had never heard someone play double bass like that ever before.

2) Those who were teenagers in the 90's or later, who only saw Lars simplify his playing, while thousands upon thousands of drummers learned every Lars Ulrich trick and then improved upon it many times over, while Lars himself stopped trying to improve himself, apparently went backwards in ability.

What many people don't realize is yes, today they can turn on MTV or youtube or whatever and find 1,000,001 players who can do insane things with double bass than Lars couldn't do in his wildest dreams. But 20 years ago those other players didn't exist, and there was no youtube to watch them on.

While Lars was "the guy" (with a handful of others) who was doing it, and actually selling records, and putting himself in places where people could see and hear him. Most of these modern players wouldn't be playing what they play if Lars had not set the ground work first and been around to be copied and improved upon.

I clearly remember that night in 1988. I had graduated high school. I was working part time at a drum shop. I came home from work, had dinner, did whatever, and turned on MTV. The world premier of "One" came on. I was floored. I had never seen anyone use double bass like that before. The sheer epic-ness, the sheer power. I ran out and bought the album.

And holy cow, what an album at the time. They're playing thrash in 7/4. They're throwing in bars of 5/4 into the mix. Lars is going over the bar line, then playing a fill to land back on the 1. It was complex, powerful, epic, raw and refined at the same time.



Muck like in jazz, a lot of the early pioneers like Zutty Singleton and Cozy Cole are often forgotten in favor of the 2nd and 3rd generation jazz of players who took everything the early guys did and improved it, and used better recording technology to make more people aware that they could play they way they do. (and no, I'm not comparing Lars to jazz legends). Lars laid a lot of ground work for others to build upon, and as others built upon his ground work, fewer and fewer people remember that it was his ground work, because it doesn't compare to what has come since then.

And sadly, over the years, Lars hasn't kept up his skills, further diminishing his reputation in drummer history.

I remember looking at Lars as a major inspiration for what could be done on the drum kit.

Do I look at him the same way now? Of course not. But that doesn't discount what he did in the past.


And Arky is 100% that it's pretty pointless to pick Lars out and compare him to any other drummer and point of 'weaknesses' because those 'better' drummers are not only NOT playing with Metallica, but Lars founded the band with James, co-leads the band, and co-writes almost all of the music. You can't say Metallica would be better/worse with different drummers, because if there was a different drummer, Metallica wouldn't exist to begin with.
 
DED's thoughts on this issue seem to align with my own every time this topic comes up.

Over rated, under rated.....it makes no difference to me. I enjoyed listening to those early Metallica albums immensely.....still do. What more does Lars have to do than make for an enjoyable listening experience. I'd argue he's done his job on that front.

It's fair to say that as a young metal fan in Melbourne Australia in the mid 80's, to us no-one had a greater impact on metal drumming than Lars Ulrich and Dave Lombardo. It's such a shame to see Lars body of work with a great band diminished purely due to the fact that the genre has progressed and others have come along and raised the bar. Can only hope the kids in 20 years time have a greater understanding of what came before and we don't see the same thing happen to Carey, Adler etc.
 
As soon as I learned a new song (or solos) I thought: So what - nothing special or too complicated, I can play that. Years later I realised that it's not about whether I could play it but that actually someone came up with that cool material ...
This. There are a lot of players in the rock idiom where this is true.

And sadly, over the years, Lars hasn't kept up his skills, further diminishing his reputation in drummer history.

Do I look at him the same way now? Of course not. But that doesn't discount what he did in the past.
This is a fairly common theme among rock drummers, maybe all drummers ... perhaps even a feature of human nature existing everywhere else outside of drumming and music.

Over rated, under rated.....it makes no difference to me.
There's another concept I've been giving extra consideration toward recently. What exactly is overrated or underrated? As Arky mentioned when considering only the technical parameters; you can easily miss the crux of a player's impact if that's all you're looking at. I think this is true for Lars, Ringo, Moonie, Peart, Bonham, etc. The list goes on and on.

Lars made his mark. Perhaps if he would've died right after "...And Justice For All" we wouldn't be focusing on his decline as much as we'd be speculating on how awesome he surely would have been had he lived.

You could just as easily apply this to Moonie or Bonham.
 
I am not a fan of the music number one, but from what I have heard it isn't that complicated, so the drumming, if he indeed does play to the music would also not be to difficult. But that's me. Would I be him. No. Why would I? I would then have to play in a band that plays music I don't like.
 
To me, Metallica started the new style of metal and from there the genre stopped being enjoyable for me.

I do like Sandman and Nothing Else Matters, which probably says it all ***warning!! old fart alert!!***

The tracks I've heard of theirs have strong drumming. I'd never understood why people kept saying he was terrible.

Claiming that a musician on the world stage is hopeless is a luxury that fans and geniuses can afford - rock and pop musicians playing local venues can't say that without appearing childish and/or delusional.
 
As everyone else said, his early drumming was pretty good and pioneered a new style of drumming.

But I don't understand how someone could not progress at all in 25ish years.... I've worked effing hard over the past 10 years and I'm proud of what I've accomplished, but I'm actually excited about how much of an amazing drummer I'll be once I have 30 years under my belt... I just can't comprehend or understand not becoming amazing in that amount of time.

Would I want to be him? Hmm, no. I would want to be someone far lesser known, but far better of a drummer.
 
I am not a fan of the music number one, but from what I have heard it isn't that complicated, so the drumming, if he indeed does play to the music would also not be to difficult. But that's me. Would I be him. No. Why would I? I would then have to play in a band that plays music I don't like.


why do so many around here equate how difficult something is to play with how good a drummer is?

Im not defending Lars, I think he is fine and has done exactly what is needed for Metallica, I think there is very nice drumming on Master of Puppets and ...and justice for all

Justice in particular would be Lars most tricked out playing if has ever played any, great metal record

but I see this all the time on these boards and really think it is quite ridiculous
 
But I don't understand how someone could not progress at all in 25ish years.... I've worked effing hard over the past 10 years and I'm proud of what I've accomplished, but I'm actually excited about how much of an amazing drummer I'll be once I have 30 years under my belt... I just can't comprehend or understand not becoming amazing in that amount of time.
Easy. Some people have that laser-like focus going on when they're young and hungry, but once fame and treasure comes into the picture, suddenly there are all these other shiny objects diverting your attention (girls, yachts, etc), and maybe drumming isn't as interesting as it used to be, especially when it becomes your "day job".
 
Lars made his mark. Perhaps if he would've died right after "...And Justice For All" we wouldn't be focusing on his decline as much as we'd be speculating on how awesome he surely would have been had he lived. .

Good Point Mike.

I am not a fan of the music number one, but from what I have heard it isn't that complicated, so the drumming, if he indeed does play to the music would also not be to difficult. But that's me. Would I be him. No. Why would I? I would then have to play in a band that plays music I don't like.

The stuff on the radio tends to be the songs that have the simple parts. There are songs from before they became "radio friendly" that aren't nearly as simple.
Unless you think playing in 5, 7, etc fills going over the bar line, and highly syncopated double bass patterns are not complicated.

I'd never understood why people kept saying he was terrible.

There are some live clips floating around youtube where he is rather underwhelming, and plays like he's not even taking his own performance seriously. For a period of time, he also started simplifying his own parts to the older stuff, which fueled speculation that he either couldn't, or didn't care to, play his own parts anymore.

..


The other internet flap was over a song "Dyers Eve" on the And Justice for All album. It contains an extremely fast double bass part. Well, thousands of kids went home, practiced it, learned it, got it down, and then played similar parts on thousands of other metal records, and it came out that Lars never played the song begging to end, and he had actually recorded it in sections, and further, the band rarely plays the long live due it's difficulty. Which lead to millions of kids saying, "well so-and-so can play that part, and Lars can't, that must mean Lars sucks. " without ever really looking at it objectively.
 
..........when considering only the technical parameters; you can easily miss the crux of a player's impact if that's all you're looking at.

I agree. Too many look for sheer virtuosity in a player I think. Not everyone is that type of player, nor is everyone called to be. Ultimately I think musicianship must trump a players technical prowess, surely? A band is the sum of many parts, the drums are just one of them. If that drummer lays down a solid foundation for the music to launch off, then he's done his job IMHO......regardless of how fast his feet are or how many triple ratamacues he can shove into a fill. Sure it can be exciting and it certainly entertains a drum forum, but is impressing other drummers really the ultimate goal?

But I don't understand how someone could not progress at all in 25ish years....

It's an interesting one. I guess it's easy to rest on your laurels when you have a formula that obviously works. Drummers may cane him, but fans are still buying albums.....in Lars' mind, I'm sure he thinks he's doing ok. Of course it could also be that the time that used to be spent practising drums has become overshadowed by the time it takes to count his millions. :)
 
I think he hasn't dinished in skill. I really liked their last album and it brought back that intense Metallica I love. I was a metal head in high school and I will tell you that in my opinion from experiences with heavy metal friends, is that heavy metal fans are die hards. Most love metal and that's it. They don't like change of music much. Metallica has been at it for years and their style has really changed from album to album and Lars stepped it back I fit the mood more. A lot of old school Metallica fans hated some
Of the later stuff since it wasn't like kill em all or ride the lightning. I think all bands should evolve and adapt to their tastes. I appreciate albums and how bands progress over ears now that iced played drums for 5 years. I mean look at one of my favorite bands, judas priest. They've changed so much over the years with different musicians. I mean how can the same guy write " painkiller" and " turbo lover". Their so different. A lot of drummers might hate since Travis barker, Lars and tommy lee are the only drummers that non-drummers know and it might aggravate us to hear the same names over and over.
 
I do like Sandman and Nothing Else Matters, which probably says it all ***warning!! old fart alert!!***

If anything this statement makes you appear more 'spry' given the black album released in 1991! Most old Metallica farts were weened on the older stuff:

  • Kill 'Em All - 1983
  • Ride the Lightning - 1984
  • Master of Puppets - 1986
  • ...And Justice for All - 1988
You still might be an old fart - but not necessarily based on your Metallica tastes!
 
That double bass groove in the second half of "One" still gives me shivers when I hear it. Some great playing on those first 4 records.

I've always found Lars to be somewhat similar to Keith Moon. Their playing and understanding of the instrument is very unorthodox, different from most drummers. Moon is revered by many and Lars, well, not quite.

Love the drum sound on Master of Puppets btw. Drums sound absolutely huge.
 
I will say that the intro to and justice for all is one of the first tunes that made me want to play the drums. Loved the chyna on that album. Real trashy. They kinda of really turned he bass guitar off on that album and made Lars step it up.
 
If anything this statement makes you appear more 'spry' given the black album released in 1991! Most old Metallica farts were weened on the older stuff:

  • Kill 'Em All - 1983
  • Ride the Lightning - 1984
  • Master of Puppets - 1986
  • ...And Justice for All - 1988
You still might be an old fart - but not necessarily based on your Metallica tastes!

I thought Polly meant due to her tame Metallica tastes!
 
There are some live clips floating around youtube where he is rather underwhelming, and plays like he's not even taking his own performance seriously.

Yes, I've seen a couple - more than anything he seems to be playing to the crowd, and most seem to be having fun.

He's getting away with coasting, and that's fine. He paid his dues - paving the way to an era of music (painful as it is for me) and he laid down many challenging, tight tracks. I don't judge John Wetton and Carl Palmer for going into saccharine AOR either - they had so much inspired music behind them. They didn't owe anyone anything, except maybe their kids' futures.


I agree. Too many look for sheer virtuosity in a player I think. Not everyone is that type of player, nor is everyone called to be. Ultimately I think musicianship must trump a players technical prowess, surely? A band is the sum of many parts, the drums are just one of them. If that drummer lays down a solid foundation for the music to launch off, then he's done his job IMHO......regardless of how fast his feet are or how many triple ratamacues he can shove into a fill. Sure it can be exciting and it certainly entertains a drum forum, but is impressing other drummers really the ultimate goal?

Nicely put!


If anything this statement makes you appear more 'spry' given the black album released in 1991!

You still might be an old fart - but not necessarily based on your Metallica tastes!

lol - sharp ob, Lance.

Tragically, I think of 1991 as "recent" ... we have heaps of members who were in nappies then ... or not even a twinkle in their father's eye. My Dad's having an old age health assessment later this week ... I should ask for a two-for-the-price-of-one deal :)

Whatever, Lars's playing on those 1991 tracks sounded spot on to me. I suspect some of the hostility towards him comes from his prickly personality.
 
I've listened to the first four Metallica albums quite a bit lately, and agree with DED's assessments. Lars' parts perfectly fit those albums, sound great, and, along with Dave Lombardo, influenced a ton of metal drummers. The standard of metal drumming in 2012 is ridiculous! Busy, syncopated kicks like One except faster. Crazy cymbal work with lots of bell, splash, and china flourishes. Insane fills and creativity. Blast beats, with people playing up to 300 BPM. And all tight as a metronome! But drummers like Lars and Dave really got the ball rolling with regard to Thrash Metal, and influenced modern metal to a degree that it is impossible to ignore.
 
Lars summary began with: "Hit The Lights", "Fight Fire With Fire", "Battery" and "The Shortest Straw" The rest is metal history...
 
I suspect some of the hostility towards him comes from his prickly personality.

I feel this may be the crux of the matter: most of the bile stirred up about Lars Ulrich tends to [still] revolve around the whole Napster thing and how he comes across in interview rather than anything to do with his prowess as a drummer.

I don't think he (or Metallica as a whole) did themselves any favours by agreeing to do the Some Kind of Monster film. I doubt it garnered as much sympathy for them as the producers perhaps thought. I don't know Metallica personally and I don't really care to know their off-stage troubles; I found the first 5 Metallica albums to be immensely exciting and was lucky enough to see them at venues like Donnington in the '90s when they were (arguably) at the peak of their global success and still a very tight musical unit.

It's a shame that so many drummers (and non-drummers) these days focus on who-can-out-do-who on YouTube as though music were some kind of gladiatorial contest and that everyone should be running at red-hot maximum 24 hours a day otherwise they're a wussy sell out. No kidding Lars Ulrich isn't as fast as he used to be - he's 48 years old and has toured round the entire planet on and off for the best part of 30 years. Compare that effort to 15 minutes in your Mum's basement with a video camera.
 
Back
Top