No Brian, I just couldn't give a flying crap.
If you're that convinced by things, start a Kickstarter, get some funds together and take it to the UK courts. Seriously. If you think it's that worthy of following up, do that rather than trying to throw your (frankly vitriolic) weight around on this forum.
Why do you react that way? Do you realize the offense you commit by both saying it is nonsense and saying it is worth taking to the authorities? So which is it? Is it nonsense or it is worth taking to court? You seem to be reserving the right to not only say both things but also to dictate the subject out of a thread where it is on-topic. My input isn't off-topic here or in violation. It's funny how some people call for the proof and then when you show it they react like you've done something wrong. It's funny how some people say they don't give a flying crap (pretty cold considering) but then show strong feelings and post about it. These people care very much. Only in a way where they want to censor the subject. Sort of a reverse morality. Killing the messenger...
Another thing is accusing me of throwing my weight around. That's another travesty considering how the vast majority of internet posters either troll the subject or attack and ban people who bring it up. It's pretty obvious that some people have an unconscious guilt over Jimi's murder. A good majority come from England.
Let me see. Jimi is murdered and it is covered-up by the most insidiously powerful, power-abusing government and media authorities. Most people don't analyze it in any intelligent way and deal with it in a superficial manner leaving the subject unsolved and confusing. The majority see it as an uncomfortable subject and give people who can articulate the evidence they are calling for a hard time (which includes ignoring, persecution, ridicule, and banning as a reward for standing up and doing the right thing) and you're saying that the one person who figures it out and proves it is somehow "vitriolic" (???) and throwing his weight around? Funny you didn't say that to the bullies who were much less polite when they were calling us nuts and tin foilers. Nor did you call them on their lack of response when it was time to back that up.
Evidence is evidence man. How some people react to it says more about them than anything. I can't help it if I'm good and I'm not going to apologize for it. Trouble is none of Jimi's constituency ever had the backbone or decency to do this. They should really have the sense to stay quiet at this point. It's kind of obvious that they would be happy staying quiet and letting Jimi burn. I'm not the one who should be answering the questions here. And standing up for Jimi isn't any offense, nor do I offer any apology for it.
The lines some people will cross and how low they will go in defense of their denial speaks for itself. Your opinion of this thread is irrelevant to the evidence you are using it to avoid. You protest too much. Get back to us when you can respectfully address what was said. It's laughable folly to draw out a gaunlet of the worst forces in the world that were responsible for this in the first place, tell me to scrap together pennies in order to fight it, treat it with hateful disrespect and scorn, and then accuse me of throwing my weight around. Foolish and exposing at the least.
Just call me Lysol lol.
I won't write my last line in respect for the site.