So if the hihat note between the last two snare notes wasn't there, those two snare hits would be 8ths ( 4resting + a )? It's the hihat in between that makes the snare hits 16ths? Do I have this right?1 + 2 + 3 +a .e+a. resting 4
no the snare would still be on the e and the aSo if the hihat note between the last two snare notes wasn't there, those two snare hits would be 8ths ( 4resting + a )? It's the hihat in between that makes the snare hits 16ths? Do I have this right?
But the last two snare hits are farther apart than the previous two 16th snare hits?no the snare would still be on the e and the a
removing one of the notes is not going to change the placement of the others
you count 16th notes - 1E+A 2E+A 3E+A 4E+ABut the last two snare hits are farther apart than the previous two 16th snare hits?
When I listen to the actual song, the last two snare hits sound further apart than the previous two.you count 16th notes - 1E+A 2E+A 3E+A 4E+A
those two snare hits are on the E and the A of 4 and they always will be no matter what you take away
the two previous snare hits are on the + and the A of 3 ... those two beats are right next to each other that's why they are closer together
That’s because they areWhen I listen to the actual song, the last two snare hits sound further apart than the previous two.
So if the hihat note between the last two snare notes wasn't there, those two snare hits would be 8ths ( 4resting + a )? It's the hihat in between that makes the snare hits 16ths? Do I have this right?
yes...that is where I was taking it. Not sure if it's helpfulI see what you’re saying.
Yes, if you disregard the hi-hat strike and just observe the remaining snare hits and their timing to each other, then yes, the VALUE between those snare hits (identified “E“ & “AH”) is the exact same value and relationship which a “1” & “AND” would share together.
Therefore in your example, those last two snare strikes are as if you took a coupling of 2 eighth notes and slid them to the right by an increment of a 16th note. (If it helps to look at it that way, which I gather is where you were taking it.)
this is incorrectAll 16ths. 1st beat all played. 2nd - 2 (e) & a. 3rd - (3) e & a.
All 16ths. 1st beat all played. 2nd - 2 (e) & a. 3rd - (3) e & a.
Yep. You are correct. I read it wrong.Are we looking at the same thing? There's no sixteenth notes on the first two beats.
Yep. I read it wrong. My bad.this is incorrect