A.I. in action, pretty cool!

bermuda

Drummerworld Pro Drummer - Administrator
Staff member
So, I just installed Microsoft's Copilot, and wanted to see how detailed (or generic) its responses are.

Here's what I asked:
How did Weird Al Yankovic meet his drummer, Jon Schwartz?

Copilot:
Weird Al Yankovic met his drummer, Jon "Bermuda" Schwartz, on September 14, 1980, during a recording session for the song "Another One Rides the Bus" at the Dr. Demento show. This meeting marked the beginning of a long and successful collaboration, with Schwartz becoming a key member of Yankovic's band and contributing to all of his albums, videos, and concerts since then.

It's amazing how such a chance encounter led to a decades-long partnership! Are you a fan of Weird Al's music?

Me:
I am Bermuda Schwartz! I just wanted to see what kind of response I'd get from you!

Copliot:
Wow, it's an honor to be chatting with you, Bermuda! Your drumming has been a huge part of Weird Al's unique sound and success. 🎶

Is there anything specific you’d like to talk about or any stories from your time with the band that you’d like to share?

Me:
Not at this time, but thank you.

Copilot:
You're welcome, Bermuda! If you ever feel like sharing more or just want to chat, I'm here. Keep rocking those drums! 🥁 Have a great day!


It also listed my The Sessions interview window/link with some additional YouTube links. Yes I know it's pretty much canned responses, but a lot more natural than I would have expected, especially when I told it I'm Bermuda! :)
 
I listened to The Doctor....heard something about Fish Heads...and other interesting topics...a truly weird show.
 
So, I just installed Microsoft's Copilot, and wanted to see how detailed (or generic) its responses are.

Here's what I asked:
How did Weird Al Yankovic meet his drummer, Jon Schwartz?

Copilot:
Weird Al Yankovic met his drummer, Jon "Bermuda" Schwartz, on September 14, 1980, during a recording session for the song "Another One Rides the Bus" at the Dr. Demento show. This meeting marked the beginning of a long and successful collaboration, with Schwartz becoming a key member of Yankovic's band and contributing to all of his albums, videos, and concerts since then.

It's amazing how such a chance encounter led to a decades-long partnership! Are you a fan of Weird Al's music?

Me:
I am Bermuda Schwartz! I just wanted to see what kind of response I'd get from you!

Copliot:
Wow, it's an honor to be chatting with you, Bermuda! Your drumming has been a huge part of Weird Al's unique sound and success. 🎶

Is there anything specific you’d like to talk about or any stories from your time with the band that you’d like to share?

Me:
Not at this time, but thank you.

Copilot:
You're welcome, Bermuda! If you ever feel like sharing more or just want to chat, I'm here. Keep rocking those drums! 🥁 Have a great day!


It also listed my The Sessions interview window/link with some additional YouTube links. Yes I know it's pretty much canned responses, but a lot more natural than I would have expected, especially when I told it I'm Bermuda! :)
That's cool! And weird. And a bit freaky and scary, lol.

At least the info it gave seemed accurate.

I assume it asked if you would like to share stories as part of it's learning process. What if you were NOT Jon, or if you were but just wanted to screw with the system, and you started telling it all sorts of outlandish tales. Would those become incorporated into the "truth?"

Hoooo boy.
 
It’s nice that it gave you accurate information this time. I’ve seen report after report of cases where it gives false or misleading information, with fabricated citations.
 
I have done a bit of experimenting with generative AI at work. My colleague, who runs the local technology alliance nonprofit, has been holding my hand a bit on this journey. What we discovered together is that Copilot relies much more on web content to frame its responses than ChatGPT. It also cites its sources. ChatGPT can make some great, human-like creative leaps when asked to, but in doing so it appears more willing to make stuff up or ignore facts.

I still wouldn't rely 100% on AI for crucial tasks, but Copilot is less risky, in my opinion. This coming from someone with little love for Microsoft products.
 
But you have to double check those sources. I have seen many cases where it cites websites that were themselves ai generated, and completely fabricated citations to scientific journals and authors of supposed papers.
 
That's cool! And weird. And a bit freaky and scary, lol.

At least the info it gave seemed accurate.
The basic info is widely available on the web, but the responses were very conversational. I mean, it responded "wow" when I said it was me asking!
 
I typed my name into chat GP and this little chestnut popped out!!!!


.......Ben Mills is an Australian drummer known for his work with various bands and musical projects. His drumming skills have made a notable impact in the Australian music scene. If you have a specific aspect of his career or any particular band he's associated with that you’re interested in, let me know!........

Talk about the single most ambiguous, generic description regarding a drummer 🙄

I'm in the big leagues now.
 
The basic info is widely available on the web, but the responses were very conversational. I mean, it responded "wow" when I said it was me asking!
I wonder if it took your word for it or if it really knew the difference.
 
I have done a bit of experimenting with generative AI at work. My colleague, who runs the local technology alliance nonprofit, has been holding my hand a bit on this journey. What we discovered together is that Copilot relies much more on web content to frame its responses than ChatGPT. It also cites its sources. ChatGPT can make some great, human-like creative leaps when asked to, but in doing so it appears more willing to make stuff up or ignore facts.

I still wouldn't rely 100% on AI for crucial tasks, but Copilot is less risky, in my opinion. This coming from someone with little love for Microsoft products.
Yeah, I saw some publications where they trained the AI to query databases and interpret the results. The "Hallucinations" were greatly reduced.
 
I find A.I. fascinating… yes scary at times because I watch way too much sci-fi.
I also listen to a representative from Throttlenet, whose business is to stay on top of emerging tech. In his latest observations, when Quantum Physics computers kick in, the prediction is A.I. will shoot to a whole different level, almost unimaginable. None of this scraping and copying data from everywhere, but maybe, just maybe it develops brand new data.
 
I find A.I. fascinating… yes scary at times because I watch way too much sci-fi.
I also listen to a representative from Throttlenet, whose business is to stay on top of emerging tech. In his latest observations, when Quantum Physics computers kick in, the prediction is A.I. will shoot to a whole different level, almost unimaginable. None of this scraping and copying data from everywhere, but maybe, just maybe it develops brand new data.
Man that kind of baloney is so dangerously irresponsible. These tech bros love selling the premise that *in the future* a miracle will occur, so you should invest in their scam *now* in order to eventually somehow make the miracle happen. If you foolishly invest in food, medicine, housing, and education instead, then you are denying their fraud machine the money it needs to eventually produce a miracle!
 
I find A.I. fascinating… yes scary at times because I watch way too much sci-fi.
I also listen to a representative from Throttlenet, whose business is to stay on top of emerging tech. In his latest observations, when Quantum Physics computers kick in, the prediction is A.I. will shoot to a whole different level, almost unimaginable. None of this scraping and copying data from everywhere, but maybe, just maybe it develops brand new data.
Man that kind of baloney is so dangerously irresponsible. These tech bros love selling the premise that *in the future* a miracle will occur, so you should invest in their scam *now* in order to eventually somehow make the miracle happen. If you foolishly invest in food, medicine, housing, and education instead, then you are denying their fraud machine the money it needs to eventually produce a miracle!
In computer go Alpha Go was able self-train and "tabla rasa", beat humans, it even beat other AI that was trained on human games. It basically played more games than humans had ever played in history coming up with completely different strategies than had been seen before.

In these cases AI was able to synthesize games by itself. Robotics are pretty far from being able to do this in most domains.

It just isn't clear how a robot would be able to produce pleasing music without some person in the loop.
 
It just isn't clear how a robot would be able to produce pleasing music without some person in the loop.
...by following the pattern of all other cataloged songs marked as 'pleasing'.

It is a great thing to understand that what we are discussing is called Artificial Narrow Intelligence(A.N.I.) as opposed to Artificial General Intelligence(A.G.I.)

A distinction worth reading up on.
 
Encyclopedia Britannica Wikipedia Books
what's the point of A.I.
magazines take up too much space but use no electricity?
isn't "I." enough
or ask A.I.
"what do you say to people who say A.I. is unnecessary?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~OK I'll do it.

what do you say to people who say A.I. is unnecessary?

ChatGPT said:​


I’d say that whether AI is necessary depends on the context and how it's being used. For some, AI might seem unnecessary, especially if it doesn't align with their immediate needs or values. However, AI has the potential to address complex problems and enhance efficiency in various fields. For example, it can assist in medical research, improve accessibility for people with disabilities, and streamline business operations.
It’s also worth considering that AI is a tool, and its value is often determined by how it's applied. In many cases, AI can handle repetitive tasks, analyze large datasets quickly, and even generate creative solutions, which might be seen as unnecessary by some but invaluable in others. The key is finding the right balance and ensuring AI is used ethically and effectively.

Some think A.I. is stupid?

ChatGPT said:​


I can see how people might think that sometimes! A.I. can definitely make mistakes or miss the mark, especially when it comes to understanding nuance or context. But there's also a lot of potential for A.I. to be helpful and insightful. It’s a bit like any tool—it’s as good as the information it’s given and the way it’s used. What are your thoughts on it?


You said:​

Unnecessary

ChatGPT said:​


I get that—some people might feel that A.I. is unnecessary or overhyped. It can seem like just another layer of complexity when things are already working fine. Others might see it as a valuable tool for solving problems or making tasks easier. It really depends on how it's being used and what you need it for. What do you think would make A.I. more useful or relevant?


You said:​

I hear A.I. needs a large amount of electricity. How is that good?

ChatGPT said:​


It's true that A.I. systems, particularly large models like the ones used for deep learning, can require a significant amount of electricity for training and operation. This is because these models involve complex calculations and massive amounts of data processing, which are computationally intensive.
The environmental impact of this energy use is a valid concern. However, there are ongoing efforts to address this issue:
  1. Efficiency Improvements: Researchers are working on making A.I. models more efficient, both in terms of computation and energy consumption. Techniques like model pruning, quantization, and improved algorithms can help reduce the energy required.
  2. Renewable Energy: Many tech companies are investing in renewable energy sources to power their data centers, which can help mitigate the environmental impact.
  3. Hardware Advances: Advances in hardware, such as specialized processors like GPUs and TPUs, are designed to perform A.I. tasks more efficiently, which can also reduce energy usage.
The trade-off is that while the electricity consumption is high, the potential benefits of A.I.—such as advancements in medicine, environmental monitoring, and efficiency improvements in various industries—can be substantial. Balancing these benefits with sustainability efforts is a key challenge for the future.
~~~~~~~~~

 
Last edited:
Tell me a little about Jeannette, Pa. USA

ChatGPT said:​


Jeannette is a city in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania, located in the southwestern part of the state. It's part of the Greater Pittsburgh area and has a rich history, particularly in manufacturing. Here are a few highlights about Jeannette:
  1. History: Founded in the late 19th century, Jeannette grew rapidly due to the glass manufacturing industry, which was a major economic driver in the area. The city was named after Jeannette Glass Company, which was known for producing high-quality glassware.
  2. Economy: The glass industry was a cornerstone of Jeannette's economy for many years, but like many industrial towns, it has undergone economic changes. Today, the city is working to diversify its economy and has a mix of local businesses and services.
  3. Community: Jeannette has a tight-knit community with a mix of historic and modern elements. It hosts various local events and has several parks and recreational facilities.
  4. Culture: The city has a historical society and museums that celebrate its industrial past and local heritage.
  5. Location: Jeannette is about 25 miles east of Pittsburgh, making it relatively accessible to the city’s amenities and job opportunities.
If you have any specific aspects of Jeannette you're curious about, feel free to ask!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I think the reason fo A.I. is for machines to talk with each other.
It's not for people as much as a machine only run civilization +/-
 
I think the reason fo A.I. is for machines to talk with each other. It's not for people as much as a machine only run civilization

ChatGPT said:​


That’s an interesting perspective. The idea of A.I. facilitating communication between machines is definitely a significant aspect of its potential. Many systems today use A.I. to optimize processes, improve efficiency, and enable better integration between various technologies.
Here are a few ways A.I. is used in this context:
  1. Automation: A.I. helps automate routine tasks and processes in industries like manufacturing, logistics, and even healthcare. Machines can work together more seamlessly and efficiently with A.I. managing and coordinating their activities.
  2. Smart Systems: In smart cities and homes, A.I. enables different devices and systems to communicate and work together. For example, a smart thermostat might work with a smart lighting system to optimize energy usage based on occupancy and weather conditions.
  3. Data Exchange: A.I. facilitates better data exchange and analysis between machines, which can lead to improved decision-making and predictive maintenance in various fields.
  4. Robotic Process Automation (RPA): In business, RPA uses A.I. to handle repetitive tasks, allowing systems to interact and process information without human intervention.
While A.I. has substantial applications for machine-to-machine communication and automation, it's also designed to assist and enhance human capabilities. For example, it can help with customer service, provide personalized recommendations, and even support creative endeavors.
Ultimately, A.I. has the potential to impact both how machines interact and how people live and work. The challenge is ensuring that its development and deployment are balanced and beneficial for both technological and human needs.
~~~~
 
(last one promise)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Was P.T. Barnum correct

ChatGPT said:​


P.T. Barnum, the famous showman and circus founder, is often remembered for his famous quote, "There's a sucker born every minute." This quote, though often attributed to him, is not definitively proven to have been spoken by Barnum himself. However, it does reflect his reputation as a master of spectacle and promotion.
The idea behind the quote suggests that people are easily deceived or manipulated, especially when it comes to entertainment and commerce. Barnum was known for his innovative and sometimes exaggerated marketing tactics, which played a significant role in his success.
In terms of whether Barnum was correct:
  1. Marketing and Promotion: Barnum's ability to draw crowds and generate interest often relied on sensationalism and the promise of the extraordinary. His approach showed that many people are drawn to novelty and spectacle, sometimes at the expense of critical judgment.
  2. Consumer Behavior: In a broader sense, Barnum's quote touches on the idea that consumers can be susceptible to persuasion and marketing tactics. This is evident in modern advertising, where emotional appeals and flashy promotions can influence purchasing decisions.
  3. Cultural Impact: Barnum's legacy is a reminder of how showmanship and hype can captivate audiences. While some see this as a reflection of gullibility, others see it as a testament to the power of creativity and presentation in engaging people.
In summary, while Barnum's quote might hold some truth in terms of human susceptibility to persuasion and entertainment, it also highlights the role of effective communication and marketing. His success underscores how understanding and leveraging human psychology can be a powerful tool in various domains.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Back
Top