Nooooo. Amazing songs and incredible musicianship.If there were 28 documentaries about the Kinks, we would likely have much more appreciation and admiration for the work of the Kinks. Familiarity has a lot to do with why many people like the Beatles so much.
to me its about the music not the fimiliartyIf there were 28 documentaries about the Kinks, we would likely have much more appreciation and admiration for the work of the Kinks. Familiarity has a lot to do with why many people like the Beatles so much.
Category:Documentary films about the Beatles - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
You hit the nail on the head ice !I don't think that's 100% true... i grew up in detroit in the 70's and got bombarded with Zep,ACDC and Nugent non-stop... All 3 i can't stomach for more than bout 5 seconds now, I still listen to beatles all the time just due to the music being soo good.. If it wasn't good people would stop listening or caring bout it
I think if there was as much interest in the Kinks as the Beatles, there would be 28 documentaries about the Kinks.If there were 28 documentaries about the Kinks, we would likely have much more appreciation and admiration for the work of the Kinks. Familiarity has a lot to do with why many people like the Beatles so much.
Category:Documentary films about the Beatles - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Has it turned into a bad idea?It struck me that nobody said to them at the time, are you sure this is a good idea lads!
Yes, it‘s long. I first thought it was a typical 90-minute documentary, only to discover three 3-hour episodes. oof!I've ambled my way through the documentary. It takes a bit to get through and can be a bit of a slog.
Brian Epstein, the only guy who could and would have questioned this production, had died a little over a year prior.It struck me that nobody said to them at the time, are you sure this is a good idea lads!
The Beatles were a money-making machine for the label. Given this “TV” opportunity, there was MOAR money to be made.Too many randoms involved in the whole process
Like I said above - who says this was a mistake or bad?Brian Epstein, the only guy who could and would have questioned this production, had died a little over a year prior.
The Beatles were a money-making machine for the label. Given this “TV” opportunity, there was MOAR money to be made.
Please, just let us discuss their consideration of this undertaking without your arrows. None of them looked particularly excited to be there in the first episode. They were struggling. George was clearly not respected and put out. Ringo looked buzzed most of the time. The entire endeavor did not look healthy.Like I said above - who says this was a mistake or bad?
After Epstein died, who was their manager?The Beatles were in almost compete control of their destiny, direction and productions. The label (EMI) would have had zero input on whether to make a documentary of the Let It Be sessions or not. I don't think it cured to any of there Fab 4 that the would be 'money making'. Again, they were innovating and pushing the creative boundaries of what it was to be a band (at the time).
I'm discussing it.Please, just let us discuss their consideration of this undertaking without your arrows.
After Epstein died, who was their manager?
Has it turned into a bad idea?
The thing about The Beatles is that they innovated just about everything we think is normal now.
Bands writing their own material. Writing in the studio, taking months to record an album. Playing big outdoor stadiums. Singles that are longer than 3 minutes. Must videos (albeit on film and Elvis was of course also making movies at the time).
And documenting their work in long form with a film crew (like Metallica).
No, it was released at the time and has been one of my favourite movies for years.It was ultimately an aborted project that only saw the light of day because the engineers were instructed not to throw anything away.
No, it was released at the time and has been one of my favourite movies for years.
Let It Be (1970 film) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
When you make a fly on the wall doco you shoot way more footage than you can use.
Director Michael Lindsay-Hogg made his own creative decisions on the mood of the movie, what was in, what was out.
All that happened was that they opened up the vault and gave Peter Jackson all the hours of raw footage and he made some different creative decisions.
The Beatles won a grammy for best movie score for the original 1970 'Let It Be' and the song itself won an Oscar.
Lol not sure Ray Davies himself could sit through a nine-hour Kinks documentary.If there were 28 documentaries about the Kinks, we would likely have much more appreciation and admiration for the work of the Kinks. Familiarity has a lot to do with why many people like the Beatles so much.
Category:Documentary films about the Beatles - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Get Back sticking- rrL rrL rrL rrL
I'm a big fan of The Kinks, and I'd be interested in a proper documentary about them and their career.If there were 28 documentaries about the Kinks, we would likely have much more appreciation and admiration for the work of the Kinks. Familiarity has a lot to do with why many people like the Beatles so much.
Category:Documentary films about the Beatles - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I’m pretty sure they did some film grain smoothing too.It was shot on 16mm Arriflex and other high quality film cameras using Kodak film that had an ISO speed of 100. You can get a very high quality image from that combination so they had a good base to start from.