![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
What kind of snare is this? is it good quality? Does it sound good? i e-mailed him some pics i seen on the net, and he told me that was the same snare. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I truly have no idea of the quality, but it looks freakin sweet. I would love to have an uncle who gave me free drums randomly :)
__________________
"If they tell you no pain no gain... shoot them." -Jim Chapin |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Those are great drums. Loud as hell and sensitive as well. They sound great with a coated ambassador. I used one "back in the day."
__________________
More Drums Than God. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you dont want it, i'll have it!
It probably settling around the mark of Metal/Rock drum, a deep steel shell.
__________________
Gretsch - Silverfox - Meinl - Janus - Gibraltar - Evans |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Mike http://www.mikemccraw.com http://www.dominoretroplate.com http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=drummermikemccraw |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great guys, I'll post picks when i get it.
lets just says it seems quite supeior to my pearl forum snare LOL. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Si i finally got it yesterday. Judging by the serial number i'm guessing its from 1982 ?
It's a little pitted and has wear and tear but it will clean up real good. I put a Evans genera dry and man does this snare project. It has some serious crack it and the rim shots heart my ears they are so loud, but it sounds really good in its own way, like nothing i've ever heard before. It has a quality feel to it. I am thrilled about this snare. Its cool to see how snares were made 25 years ago. It's definitely a keeper. ![]() ![]()
__________________
Mid 80"s Tama Imperialstar Matercraft 6.5x14 ? Ludwig Supraphonic 5x14 |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
You stole my drum! J/K That is an AWESOME snare. I love mine, it can be really "cracky" or really warm sounding. It is very loud and has a really good rebound if you tune it just right. Get a REMO Coated Ambassador Head, i have it sounds pretty dang good. Mine is a little on the rusty side though, i need to fix that....
Peace AGR |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey There!
My nameis Ed and I live in New Jersey, USA. I have the Tama Imperialstar drumkit from 1982, and i LOVE my snare drum and the sound it makes. Enjoy it! |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is this the Tama 8056 steel snare drum? If so,.....Bill Bruford used it for King Crimson in the 80's. I just bought my first brand new Ludwig supra-phonic LM402 (14 x 6.5). Can you believe I got it for only $305.00 plus tax at Guitar Center???!!!!! hahaha....Damn I'm good!!! LOL
Btw.....I am in a King Crimson tribute band called, The Great Deceivers. We are in California. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't know for certain that this is an Imperialstar drum; it is a Mastercraft Steel drum by Tama and was the standard snare on some of their drumsets in the 1980s. Its an Imperialstar alright, US catalog would have it named King Beat. The lock on the internal muffler should be plastic. 3mm die cast hoops had marginal plating, highly prone to scratching. The roller beds on the strainer were/are self adjusting. You need long snares to fit the works. Tama touted their nylon lug inserts on these drums, but they just hold the nut, worlds apart from Yamaha's nylon insert. Otherwise solid drum with the lugs being the achilles heel. Pick shows two lugs as replaced. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Exactly! This was one of my first snares, and I quickly broke all of the connector posts on the lugs. Mine had the shorter lugs. I think this was a common problem with Tama snare lugs back in the 80's, like with the freedom lugs. I ended up replacing the lugs with some cheap Pearl style lugs that fit the holes exactly, and I never broke any of those. I see someone did that very same thing in one of the pictures. Personally, I never liked the sound of this snare, particularly after I got different types of snares and compared them.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nice drum! I had this one, too. It was my one and only for 12 years until about two years ago when I sold it. Now, 4 snare drums later, I wish I still had that beast... I never had any problems with it, btw.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The longer lugs were high tension and didn't break that often. The shorter ones were a problem. I've had several of the Tama Mastercraft snares that I bought new in the 80's and they are still running strong with no problems ever. Very well made. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thesilverfox's drum here has the roller-action strainer, if he put up another pic showing the bottom you'd see it clearly. In the third photo the roller casing is visible. The snare wire pictured isn't original. The original would have been oversized and yes the 'King Beat' was cataloged as having a parallel-action strainer. As far as 'Mastercraft' a few lines- Artwood, Artstar, Bell Brass etc. came out of that shadow name with their own tags and some still live today. Nowhere on the drum itself does it say 'Mastercraft' though. Call them what you want, but despite the catalog listing as Mastercraft, these drums were usually referred to and sold as their badge name. I've owned Imperialstar with both parallel action and roller action strainer's. The long lug pic'd below is one of many off of those drums which failed. Note how the mounting hole's and their supports are bent/cracked. This is common with any pot metal lug when high(er) tension is applied over time. If you have one of these 80's Tama drums and you tune high(er), chances are great some of the lugs are distorted. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I can see the strainer in this thread is a roller action. That makes it the SS2, not the Parallel which makes this particular drum a Mastercraft. The King Beat parallel strainer is different. I will post the pic. The strainers are not interchangable. You can see in the picture of the catalog that the parallel strainer has a hoop on the end. The Mastercarft strainers with the double roller do not have this feature. I know everyone refers to these as Imperialstar but it blurs the differences of the snares. They are all not the same. I beleive the Bell Brass has a Superstar badge but I certainly would not refer to it as such. I have the Rosewood and it has the Superstar badge. My Artstar cordia has an Artstar badge. I wonder how damaged my lugs are. I never took them apart (never needed to) but I can see where damage would occur. You are correct in that pot metal is not very strong. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
"... and yes the 'King Beat' was cataloged as having a parallel-action strainer". post #15 Last edited by Les Ismore; 06-25-2009 at 11:08 AM. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have one of these snares (Mastercraft series according to the original catalog). Anyway, never had a problem with it till a few days ago. The internal muffler knob (inner guts) cracked. Knobs are in perfect condition however (I will post pictures of the snare shortly).
Does anyone know where I can get parts (internal muffler assembly)? I would like to keep it original if possible, especially since the drum is in excellent condition. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
that is a great snare, built like a tank. Enjoy
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Assuming nobody Frankenstiened your drum and its original, it sounds like you have an older Mastercraft. I'm not sure what year they changed over, I think 81, but earlier in the production years they all had the 'generic' looking lugs like you see on the Powerline. If you go to tama.com and click on the catalog history everything is there to see. What made the Mastercraft or King Beat or Powerline different from each other was the strainer systems. All the shells are the same. And one thing I'm not sure about is the die cast hoops. I think they are standard on the Mastercraft. Most likely also on the King Beats. But I think it was an option on the Powerline or maybe not??? Besides that is easy to change out. Tama at the time was making many changes to their equipment. The Bell Brass snare changed thickness and finish. The Rosewood snares went from 12 ply to 10 ply. Lugs changed. They kept trying to improve. Here is a picture of the Mastercraft from the 1980 catalog with the small lugs Last edited by ed427vette; 06-27-2009 at 01:02 AM. Reason: added image |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have recently purchased a Tama Imperialstar Chrome 6.5 x 14 steel snare drum, serial number 15405557 (Made in Japan). It has several problems and I'm wondering if anyone can help me finding out about the drum and help me locate some parts that I need for it?
I has a missing tension knob which slides onto a splined shaft which is located inside the muffler exterior large knob with two blades on the outside perimeter. The larger knob is a quick off/on for the muffler. The missing knob appears to adjust the tension of the muffler as mentioned. I have noticed on an earlier message on this thread a picture of the muffler knobs, and my snare looks the same, but missing the inside chrome knob. As well my lugs look like the original lugs shown on this thread, although they don't appear to have any damage. The other issue is one of the two brackets which have two rollers on them is badly bent out of shape. The snare retaining strips go thru the rollers and then attach at the butt end and the strainer end. Both of the roller brackets look identical. I need a new or good used one. The drum has cast hoops, and does have a nice loud sound. I bought it to replace my 1979 Ludwig Black Beauty that I bought new and I'm considering selling. This is my first attempt to get this Tama snare in good working order. Any help would be appreciated. Regards, Barry Last edited by mono-plane; 06-29-2009 at 09:45 PM. Reason: Add more info. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Resurrecting this thread 'cause I've scored one of these, a 5x14, for 80 bucks. Looks like it's in great condition. Solid and heavy! It has the identical roller things underneath the strainer and butt plate, and lugs from that 1980 catalog photo above- same as the steel snare on the right, except the depth. It sounds pretty good even though the heads and snare wires are pretty ragged, which leads me to my reason for resurrecting the thread- what size snare wires do I need to buy? 16"? (i know the wires won't be 16", but I mean, wires for a 16" drum?) The worn-out ones on mine do extend past the bearing edge, but the end plates seem to be nearly touching the bottom of those roller-assembly things, which is making me think that these are a little TOO long. Also, there seems to be no snare beds on this drum. Is that why it requires snares that extend past the bearing edge? If I were to put normal wires for a 14" drum on it, would they not perform correctly?
*Edit*- looked mine up in the Tama catalogs. My exact drum is a 1980 Tama Mastercraft Steel 5/14, pictured here with the same roller-things on the strainer: http://www.tamadrum.co.jp/anniversar...at_id=42&now=9 Last edited by timmdrum; 01-08-2012 at 07:23 PM. |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have the same drum. I got it with my 1982 Superstar kit. It was my main snare drum for 28 years. Heavy as hell and super sensitive. I'm never gonna get rid of it.
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Despite the catalog listing as seamless, my KING BEAT had a seam... although well hidden it is there.
You have to look really close, TAMA finished these shells very well, apparently well enough to call them seamless, but not one piece. When I found the seam is when I lost interest in TAMA as a whole and haven't owned/supported them since, this was back in the 80's. Catalog descriptions were/are not immune to (we'll call it) error, especially back in the day. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bump! (Ba-dum Bump, haha) Can anyone help with my question about the snare wires, 3 posts up? :)
|
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
If I were to put normal wires for a 14" drum on it, would they not perform correctly?
Yes. The TAMA RB strainer was a bomb, its no longer being used as a result. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, it does seem cumbersome (and possibly heavy), and maybe unnecessary, but there's nothing *wrong* with it, so I don't mind using it as it is... So more specifically, if I put on wires for a 14" drum but still utilize the RB system, will that still work or do I need to have the longer ones? If I use the shorter ones, should I remove both sides of the RB assembly and just use the strainer/butt plate as on most other drums? Again, there's no snare bed on the bottom bearing edge.
|
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It'll work/function with shorter snares. Look closely inside the lip/channel (the folded over metal that forms the bearing edges) you'll find the seam. These drums are not seamless, they were well finished, the seam is hidden, hidden well enough to marketed as 'seamless'. Drawn metal shells have a reinforcing bead around their center and for good reason. TAMA deception in marketing... these shells are plain steel, welded and finished. Well, maybe not deception, you don't see a seam, so I guess they feel OK about calling it 'seamless'. Most welded metal shells of that era were not finished well, the seams were pretty obvious. A cast drum (bell brass etc.) is solid enough to not require a reinforcing bead. |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wires that work well with the Tama RB system are the Pearl freefloating models. pretty easy to find and extend across the shell like the original Tama wires did.
BTW i have a Tama Artstar cordia wood snare im selling on Ebay shameless plug :-) |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tama Kingbeat and Powerline steel snares were in fact,seamless one piece molded shells.The Tama Swingstar steel snare(MS-14),and the Royalstar steel snare(7588)had welded shells.These drums also have a thinner shell than the Kingbeat,and powerline.I have had an early 80's Kingbeat for about 25 years,and the strainer still works perfectly,and there is NO weld in the shell.:
Steve B |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|