DRUMMERWORLD OFFICIAL DISCUSSION FORUM   

Go Back   DRUMMERWORLD OFFICIAL DISCUSSION FORUM > Drum Gear > Other Gear

Other Gear Discuss Hardware and all other equipment not covered in the other topics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-06-2010, 02:18 PM
Eman101's Avatar
Eman101 Eman101 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cape Town, South AFrica
Posts: 90
Default Pearl's protrusion arm tom mounts

Hello.

I don't know if this has been discussed before. But don't you think its odd how Pearl seem determined to keep using those protrusion arms? The only other drum manufacturers I know using them are budget kit makers.

Granted, Pearl have made some great steps to make their arms attractive and strong, but to me even the best one doesn't offer the same usability and flexibility of the ball-bearing mount. It's almost as if Pearl decided a long time ago to work with the protrusion arms and they refuse to change it for whatever reason. (I have my own theories here.)

I think Pearl make great drums and hardware, but those arms just put them behind so many other manufacturers. What do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-06-2010, 03:22 PM
A-customs's Avatar
A-customs A-customs is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: south new jersey
Posts: 546
Default Re: Pearl's protrusion arm tom mounts

I Agree.To me they are the ugliest mounts on the market.Hands down...Nothing personnel,but since you asked........
__________________
Yamaha,Ludwig. A Customs.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-06-2010, 04:02 PM
sqadan's Avatar
sqadan sqadan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 358
Default Re: Pearl's protrusion arm tom mounts

Yeah... Pearl makes great drums... But my 60's era Ludwig L-Arm mounts offer easier positioning. I have always hated the pearl mounting system. And it seems really silly to me that they kept using it even after adding suspension mounts... A protrusion arm that does not "protrude" seems even more useless.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-06-2010, 04:37 PM
AtonalConductor AtonalConductor is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 7
Default Re: Pearl's protrusion arm tom mounts

Add my voice to that chorus. It's bizarre, as Pearl make some of the absolute best hardware out there. The mounting hardware is too heavy, bulky and awkward to adjust - especially from behind the drums themselves.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-06-2010, 04:52 PM
Pocket-full-of-gold's Avatar
Pocket-full-of-gold Pocket-full-of-gold is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia.
Posts: 9,913
Default Re: Pearl's protrusion arm tom mounts

Quote:
Originally Posted by AtonalConductor View Post
It's bizarre, as Pearl make some of the absolute best hardware out there.
Bizarre indeed. In the days of L-rods and ball and socket mounts allowing unidirectional placement, I don't get why they persist with it.

Agreed.......fabulous hardware......cumbersome and limited tom mounts.
__________________
What's the best cape for running away from a gig?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-06-2010, 05:14 PM
jwildman's Avatar
jwildman jwildman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 471
Default Re: Pearl's protrusion arm tom mounts

Ya man I always thought they would mess with the sound a bit. Like why couldn't they just move the hole to outside the shell like with the yamahas?
__________________
Praise him on the loud cymbals: praise him on the high sounding cymbals. Psalms 150:5
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-06-2010, 06:16 PM
sqadan's Avatar
sqadan sqadan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 358
Default Re: Pearl's protrusion arm tom mounts

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwildman View Post
Ya man I always thought they would mess with the sound a bit. Like why couldn't they just move the hole to outside the shell like with the yamahas?
Well.. they did do that... again - what makes no sense is that they kept the huge bulky mount when it does not extend into the drum any longer... and of course if you have bass drum mounted toms - the mounting plate is twice as large as most and has 2 holes penetrating the bass drum.

The most frustrating thing about this mount is the lack of lateral positioning capability... it drives me nuts having to loosen the entire arm at the bottom in order to move the drums side to side.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-06-2010, 06:16 PM
drumtechdad's Avatar
drumtechdad drumtechdad is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Anytown, USA
Posts: 1,107
Default Re: Pearl's protrusion arm tom mounts

Funny, I've never had a problem with them. Since they adjust in every direction, they can place toms wherever you wish. Once they're set where I want I never undo their positioning when I move the drums. Everything's memory locked, so setup is super quick: stick the tom arms in the bass drum, slip on the toms and you're done.

Meanwhile, I have used ball-type tom mounts and have had them take a "set" after a period of time--i.e., they get indentations that actually preclude infinite adjustment after a while.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-06-2010, 06:20 PM
zambizzi's Avatar
zambizzi zambizzi is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Big Bad Boise
Posts: 4,048
Default Re: Pearl's protrusion arm tom mounts

I dunno...I like 'em. I find it easier to adjust where my 12" tom sits than with RIMS-style suspension mounts. Where you put the drum is where it will sit when you tighten up the arm. On suspension mounts, there always seems to be some "settling" that you have to account for and it's harder to get it right. It seems more stable too, where as suspension mounts allow the drum to bounce and wiggle more, when played.

I like the larger tube + Optimount. I care less about how it looks (even though I don't think it looks bad) than how it functions, and it functions quite well.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Bernhard Castiglioni's DRUMMERWORLD.com