sacco
Senior Member
I found in a bag an old pair of Vic Firth SD2 Bolero: I guess I bought these sticks around 1992 / 93, when I stopped playing for a very long time. Well, when I started playing again a few years ago, I bought some new sticks, and I bought some new SD2's: the model had changed, but I still found they were the right sticks for me. More recently, I bought a 50th anniversary pair of SD2's. As all VF sticks, this pair has no lacquering and only a very discrete model stamp on it.
But, as I said, I found an old pair of SD2's: well used, lacquered, with the original tip, which is not as round as the new one, and I found them fantastic! Not only because of their perfect balance, but also for the lacquering, which makes the sticks much easier to hold, and because of the tip, which I like more than the new one on cymbals. You can see the differences between old and new sticks in the pictures.
Now I have a couple of questions:
But, as I said, I found an old pair of SD2's: well used, lacquered, with the original tip, which is not as round as the new one, and I found them fantastic! Not only because of their perfect balance, but also for the lacquering, which makes the sticks much easier to hold, and because of the tip, which I like more than the new one on cymbals. You can see the differences between old and new sticks in the pictures.
Now I have a couple of questions:
- the first one is for members who have deeper market knowledge than me: is there a contemporary stick that is close to the old SD2 at least in terms of shape (I made some research but did not find anything)?
- the second one is for anyone: what do you think of lacquered / non lacquered sticks? I understand that for stick producers lacquer is an additional cost and that they have to promote the advantages of non-laquered sticks, but do you really find that avoiding the lacquering makes sticks better? Personally, I have quite dry skin and I do not sweat very much: for me, lacquered sticks reveal to be much easier to hold.