Originally Posted by Mediocrefunkybeat
Personally, yes. A masterpiece is a masterpiece, but a re-interpretation of a masterpiece creates potential for another one.
Nah. Have to disagree. No one would want to change a Picasso, a van Gogh, a Renior, or a DaVinci. That would be ridiculous.
"Works of art" are that for what they are. Changing them doesn't increase the beauty of them.
They don't need a "re-interpretation".