Originally Posted by genericdrummingusername
They likely slept through all their history classes in high school.
I can't stomach too many of the "I'm so hip" music magazines that try to clone the early Rolling Stone. They are of a generation raised on alternative in the 90's and IMO, lack an understanding of greatness past.
Rolling Stone for a long time was welded into the 67-75 timeframe and seemed too stodgy for prog and things like that.
I like classic rock, metal edge, kerrang and others of the ilk that showcase someone OTHER than just Springsteen, Dylan and U2.