Thread: Neil Peart
View Single Post
  #661  
Old 03-05-2009, 06:01 AM
trkdrmr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Neil Peart

Quote:
Originally Posted by michael drums View Post
Again, another adjective(ruined) that I totally disagree with. You may wanna think again.

Come on ns(though I love the name), that's what you have to contribute as your 2ND POST on this forum? Hmm... :-|


Ruined??


It must be me, 'cause I don't know where they come up with this stuff? Though, Mr. ns may be in disguise as someone that doesn't wanna be noticed. ;-)
It's his opinion... you should let that go, he thought about it and posted what he thinks. I happen to agree that the fidelity sucks compared to other Rush albums. I listen through everything from headphones to hifi, and VT was a murky mix. This was mentioned in a few reviews of the cd when it came out. So we are not alone in that assessment.

Do not assume that the poster isn't a pro soundman, or perhaps an audiophile with high end gear where he can analyze the recording/mastering quality to a "t". Geddy Lee has even stated presto and VT needed remastering.
Reply With Quote