Thread: Neil Peart
View Single Post
  #483  
Old 09-16-2008, 06:21 AM
Zumba_Zumba's Avatar
Zumba_Zumba Zumba_Zumba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 169
Default Re: Neil Peart

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattsmith View Post
... I want to continue to express my concern for this thought out there that drumming evolves every time it changes.
Isn't that "evolution"? Just because something evolves does not necessarily mean it is made better. The test of time will determine that.

Well written response as usual, Matt. I learn something every time you write. I merely meant "evolution" as a change in "flashy technique" that so many people cling to when determining the worth of a drummer (like how fast you are, for example) and how certain drummers are applying this flashy technique to today's equipment. I just remember being floored by Neil's layered parts and interdependence. Then I saw Bozzio, then Minneman, then Lang and Donati; each of them with greater interdependence and "feet=hands" technique (in my eyes, at least).

Now there can be a giant debate on how this interdependence was already done and how it really isn't music but that would be purely subjective. We could be lead through the history of music and have our hands slapped for irresponsibly slinging terms like "evolve", but the popular vote is for guys like Donati, Lang etc etc as being cutting edge in applying layered drum parts and interdependence to drum technique. The same type of stuff Neil was credited for back in the day (where so much of this "drum god" stuff probably came from in the first place).

So, I take it out of my wallet, and use it again: as drumming evolves, people will say the same negative comments about Donati (again, sorry fanboys and sorry music history buffs and WFD champions).
__________________
Give me a liter of cola.
Reply With Quote