Re: The Grand Master Buddy Rich
That makes perfect sense to me. It also reminds me of a few years ago when Garth Brooks, who at the time was at the top of the Country Music charts, declared that Rock Music was easy, and he recorded and released a rock album to prove how he could be a rock star as well. It sucked, the critics hated it, and no one bought it. He did his absolute best, and he was horrible.
Originally Posted by finnhiggins
If you make a choice it's entirely fair for people to judge you by it.
(Amazon lists 214 of the CDs new and used starting at 65 cents)
Just because you are the best at something (as many would say Buddy was), doesn't mean that you can be the best at anything else. Buddy did not have the ability to be a great rock drummer, or a great Latin drummer. That doesn't take away from what he was, but there's no need to pretend that he was more than he actually was.
Say he was a pioneer. That's a fact. Say he was the greatest drummer ever. Fine, that's an opinion. But it's just silly to say things like "His speed was equal or better than anyone today" or "He never made a mistake while drumming." No need to make him into more than he was. Any one of us should be so talented!
My kit: Pacific wood, Evans oil, Zildjian bronze
Last edited by DogBreath; 08-13-2005 at 07:50 AM.