View Single Post
  #25  
Old 01-30-2013, 05:08 PM
8Mile's Avatar
8Mile 8Mile is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,779
Default Re: Assume sound quality is equal: Digital or Analog?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BacteriumFendYoke View Post
Above 192 Kb/S, Mp3 is good enough for 99% of listeners, even. Even at lower bitrates, Mp3 is a good codec and I doubt there are a huge number of laypeople that can differentiate between 128 Kb/S and 192 Kb/S. I can (definitely) but amongst the general public? Not so much.
See, I have had trouble getting a straight answer as to whether we can tell the difference between some of these bitrates. I understand the lower bitrates are achieved by removing frequencies the human ear can't detect anyway.

Is there more to it than that? Is it a listening "skill" that anyone can develop, or is it simple physiology/age, etc?


I would love to do a truly blind A/B test and see if I could tell the difference between 128/256/320, etc.
Reply With Quote